UPSC Prelims 2017 · Question 42 of 99

UPSC Prelims 2017 question on Judicial Review Meaning

In India, Judicial Review implies

  1. the power of the Judiciary to pronounce upon the constitutionality of laws and executive orders.
  2. the power of the Judiciary to question the wisdom of the laws enacted by the Legislatures.
  3. the power of the Judiciary to review all the legislative enactments before they are assented to by the President.
  4. the power of the Judiciary to review its own judgements given earlier in similar or different cases.
Show answer

Answer: A. the power of the Judiciary to pronounce upon the constitutionality of laws and executive orders.

Verdict

The answer is the power of the judiciary to pronounce upon the constitutionality of laws and executive orders.

Analysis

Judicial review is the power to examine the constitutionality of legislative enactments and executive orders of both the Union and the States, and to declare them void if they are found ultra vires. The second option describes questioning the wisdom of legislation, which courts expressly decline to do since policy merit is for the legislature. The third describes a pre enactment advisory scrutiny that India does not have. The fourth describes the review of the court's own judgments, which is the separate power of review under Article 137.

Source

M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity, chapter on the High Court.

How to crack it

The trap is the word review itself, which carries two distinct meanings, judicial review of laws and review of the court's own earlier judgment. Whenever a familiar legal term has a second technical sense, expect both to appear among the options. Then remember the constitutional line: courts test validity, not wisdom, and any option inviting the judiciary to judge policy merit contradicts the separation of powers.

More questions on Higher Judiciary (SC and HC)

All 15 questions on Higher Judiciary (SC and HC) →

← Full 2017 question paper · All Polity questions