Do quality rules help or hurt India's manufacturing growth
Quality Control Orders make Indian standards compulsory for many products, up from 88 in 2019 to 765 by December 2024. A CSEP study finds they raise costs sharply for firms that depend on regulated inputs, and hit small firms hardest. The government has now eased the rules for some sectors.
Event date:

The brief in 6 cards
-
Context1 / 6
- Quality Control Orders (QCOs) make specified Indian Standards compulsory, enforced through the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS).
- They aim to ensure product safety and quality, and to stop unfair competition from substandard goods.
- Their number has grown sharply: from 88 products covered in 2019 to 765 by December 2024, according to the Centre for Social and Economic Progress (CSEP).
- A CSEP study finds that when QCOs cover a firm's inputs rather than its finished products, the effects on firms are often negative, and worse for small firms.
- The government has since eased some rules and reviewed several QCOs on intermediate goods.
-
Key highlights2 / 6
Concentrated on inputs: About 45.7% of QCOs in force by December 2024 covered intermediate products, including chemicals, metals, machinery, textiles, plastics and rubber.
Chemicals as a case study: QCOs on chemicals rose to 52 products by 2024. The share of chemical-using firms exposed to input-side QCOs rose from 11.8% in 2019 to 56.6% in 2024.
Imports fell, exports did not gain lastingly: CSEP found imports of affected products fell 13% in the first year and 24% over the longer term. Early export gains did not hold.
Large firms: Input-side QCO exposure was linked to a 9.6% rise in production, but a 37% fall in Gross Value Added (GVA). More output did not mean more value added at home.
Small firms: The same exposure was linked to a 47.6% fall in profitability, even though production and GVA showed no significant change.
A policy correction: Several QCOs on intermediate goods were withdrawn or suspended during 2025. In June 2026, the government created a temporary alternative route for firms struggling to get certified.
-
Key concepts3 / 6
- Quality Control Order (QCO)
- A QCO is a government order that makes an Indian Standard compulsory for a product. Without meeting it, that product cannot be made, imported, sold or distributed in India.
- It is issued under the BIS Act, 2016, and enforced through BIS certification, often shown as the ISI mark.
- QCOs apply equally to domestic and imported goods, so both must meet the same standard.
- Analogy: it works like a locked gate at the market entrance. Only goods carrying the right certificate can pass through.
News connection: The sharp rise in QCOs, from 88 to 765 products, is the central fact behind this debate.
- Intermediate goods and the downstream multiplier
- Intermediate goods are inputs used to make other products, such as chemicals used in medicines, or steel used in cars.
- Finished (or output) goods are products sold directly to the final user.
- When a QCO restricts an intermediate good, its effect does not stop there. It moves down the chain to every industry that depends on that input.
- Analogy: a delay at a single toll booth on a highway slows every vehicle behind it, no matter where each one is headed.
News connection: A QCO on a chemical input can raise costs in pharmaceuticals, electronics, rubber and plastics all at once.
- Gross Value Added (GVA)
- GVA measures the value a firm or sector adds during production, calculated as output minus the cost of inputs used.
- A firm can produce more (higher output) while adding less real value, if its input costs rise faster than its output's price.
- This is exactly what CSEP found for large firms: production rose, but GVA fell.
News connection: The CSEP findings show that a QCO can raise a firm's activity level while shrinking its actual economic contribution.
- Non-tariff barriers and WTO scrutiny
- A non-tariff barrier (NTB) is any trade restriction other than a tariff, such as a technical standard, a licensing rule or a certification requirement.
- The WTO's Trade Policy Review is a periodic exercise where member countries' trade policies are examined by other members.
- Even a standard meant purely for safety can act as an NTB if it is applied in a way that blocks trade unfairly or without enough transparency.
- Distinction: A tariff is a tax at the border. An NTB works through rules, paperwork and technical requirements instead.
News connection: India's Eighth Trade Policy Review, in July 2026, saw trading partners raise concerns about QCOs and technical regulations.
-
Way forward4 / 6
Regulate by risk: Apply strict QCOs mainly where health, safety or environmental risk genuinely justifies them, such as toys or electrical goods.
Check the supply chain first: Study domestic capacity, import dependence and downstream effects before notifying a new QCO, especially on inputs.
Support small firms: Provide subsidised testing, shared laboratories, technical help and longer transition periods for MSMEs.
Align with global standards: Match Indian Standards to internationally accepted norms where possible, to ease integration into global value chains.
Review regularly: Reassess existing QCOs using evidence on quality gains, input availability and compliance costs, not just the number of products covered.
Judge by outcomes: Evaluate QCOs by their effect on quality, productivity, GVA, exports and supply-chain resilience, not by how many products they cover.
-
Note5 / 6
The new transition mechanism
What it is: The Transition Facilitation (Quality Control) Order, 2026, notified by DPIIT on 25 June 2026.
The problem it addresses: Getting BIS certification under the standard route, called Scheme-I, can be slow. It needs a factory inspection, product testing and detailed compliance checks.
The fix: Eligible firms can temporarily source their input from suppliers already certified under Scheme-II, a simpler, self-declaration-based BIS route, while their own Scheme-I certification is being processed.
Who can use it: Only companies approved by a DPIIT committee, based on technical capability and compliance record. It does not lower the quality bar; goods must still meet the Indian Standard and carry the mark.
How long it lasts: Applications are accepted for 24 months from when the Order took effect. The Order itself runs for five years, unless extended.
Sectors covered: Toys, footwear, air conditioners, furniture, hinges, water heaters, washing machines and other household electrical appliances, among others.
-
Note6 / 6
Two sides of the debate
The case for QCOs:
- They protect consumers from unsafe or substandard products.
- They can push firms to invest in testing, traceability and better processes.
- Consistent quality helps Indian goods compete for a place in global supply chains.
- They can stop domestic manufacturers from being undercut by cheap, substandard imports.
The case for caution:
- A large share of QCOs fall on intermediate goods, not finished products, so their cost spreads across many industries.
- Some sectors under QCOs already have high market concentration among a few large firms, raising fair-competition concerns of a different kind.
- MSMEs often lack the finance and technical capacity to absorb testing and certification costs easily.
- Frequent or poorly sequenced QCOs can disrupt supply chains built around specific, often imported, inputs.
The balance the government is now attempting: Keep genuine safety and quality goals, while easing the burden through mechanisms like the Transition Facilitation Order and periodic reviews.
Swipe or use ← → to move between cards.
Sources
- The Hindu — "Quality control and India's manufacturing growth" · p. 6 · 25 September 2026
- Centre for Social and Economic Progress (CSEP) — "Decoding India's Quality Control Orders" · 25 September 2026
- ThePrint, reporting on the CSEP study · 25 July 2026
- PIB — "DPIIT Notifies Transition Facilitation (Quality Control) Order, 2026" · 25 June 2026
Syllabus
| Paper | Subject | Sub-topic |
|---|---|---|
| GS3 | Economy | Industrial policy and industrial growth, effects of liberalisation on the economy, changes in industrial policy. |
| Essay | Polity | — |
Topics
Related previous-year questions
Asked in earlier UPSC Prelims papers on this topic. Answer, then check.
Consider the following statements with reference to India: 1. According to the 'Micro Small and Medium enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006, the 'medium enterprises' are those with investments in plant and machinery between Rs. 15 crore and Rs. 25 crore. 2. All bank loans to the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises qualify under the Priority sector. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Show answer
Answer: B. Statement 1 – INCORRECT: Union Ministry of MSMEs has issued Gazette notification for implementation of the upward revision in the definition and criteria of MSMEs. As per the new criteria, a medium enterprise is where the investment in Plant and Machinery or Equipment does not exceed fifty crore rupees and turnover does not exceed two hundred and fifty crore rupees. The old MSMED Act 2006 criteria of Rs. 15–25 crore is outdated and incorrect. Statement 2 – CORRECT: In terms of Master Direction on 'Priority Sector Lending (PSL) – Targets and Classification' dated September 4, 2020, all bank loans to MSMEs conforming to the conditions prescribed therein qualify for classification under priority sector lending. Only statement 2 is correct → Option (b) 2 Only.
Difficulty: hard · statement
Open this question on its own page, with the full explanation →
Practice questions
With reference to Quality Control Orders (QCOs) in India, consider the following statements: 1. They are issued under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 2016. 2. They apply only to imported products, and not to domestically manufactured goods. 3. A majority of QCOs currently in force cover intermediate goods rather than finished products. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Show answer
Answer: A. Statements 1 and 3 are correct. Statement 2 is wrong: QCOs apply equally to domestic and imported products. Options (b) and (d) include Statement 2, and (c) leaves out Statement 3.
Difficulty: medium · statement
With reference to Gross Value Added (GVA), consider the following statements: 1. It measures the value added by a firm or sector during the production process. 2. A rise in a firm's output necessarily means a rise in its GVA. 3. GVA is calculated as the value of output minus the cost of inputs used. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Show answer
Answer: C. Statements 1 and 3 are correct. Statement 2 is wrong: output can rise while GVA falls, if input costs rise faster than the value of what is produced. Options (a), (b) and (d) all include Statement 2.
Difficulty: medium · statement
With reference to the Transition Facilitation (Quality Control) Order, 2026, consider the following statements: 1. It was notified by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade. 2. It allows eligible firms to temporarily source inputs from suppliers certified under BIS Scheme-II. 3. It removes the requirement for products to meet the applicable Indian Standard. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Show answer
Answer: A. Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is wrong: goods under the Order must still meet the applicable Indian Standard and carry the Standard Mark; only the certification route for the supplier changes. Options (b) and (d) include Statement 3.
Difficulty: medium · statement
Mains practice
Answer-writing practice on this article. Attempt it first, then open the hints.
Quality Control Orders serve legitimate public-safety objectives, yet their rapid expansion has raised concerns for India's manufacturing competitiveness. Examine this tension and suggest reforms. (250 words)
Show hints
- The purpose and legal basis of QCOs, and their rapid growth since 2019.
- The downstream multiplier effect of input-side QCOs, illustrated by the chemicals sector.
- CSEP's firm-level findings: falling GVA for large firms, falling profitability for small firms.
- Trade effects: falling imports without sustained export gains, and WTO scrutiny.
- Reforms: risk-based regulation, supply-chain impact assessment, MSME support, and the Transition Facilitation Order as an interim fix.
"Regulation meant to raise quality can, if poorly designed, quietly lower it."
Show hints
- The intended purpose of technical regulation: safety, quality, fair competition.
- How coverage and sequencing decide whether a rule helps or harms.
- The particular risk of regulating inputs versus finished goods.
- The disproportionate burden on small firms with limited resources.
- The role of evidence-based, periodically reviewed regulation.