Current Affairs · · GS2 · Polity

Opposition seeks CEC's removal after reports of internal ECI objections

Opposition parties have sought CEC Gyanesh Kumar’s removal after reports that two Election Commissioners repeatedly objected to electoral-roll decisions. The ECI says these were draft-stage views and that its final decisions, including SIR, were unanimous.

Event date:

REq1
  1. Context1 / 4
    • The Indian Express reported that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi recorded at least 14 objections over about 10 months.
    • The reported objections concerned voter additions and deletions, Form 6, electoral-roll appeals and control of voter-database systems.
    • In one recorded objection, Sandhu reportedly described changes to Form 6 as “unauthorised and illegal”. This was the Commissioner’s stated position, not a judicial finding.
    • Opposition parties subsequently demanded the resignation or removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.
    • The Election Commission rejected the suggestion of unilateral decision-making. It said differing views arose during deliberations, while final Commission decisions, including SIR, were unanimous.
  2. Key highlights2 / 4

    Form 6 dispute: Form 6 is the application used for enrolling a new voter. The two Commissioners reportedly objected to adding an SIR-linked declaration without first amending the rules.

    Database control: The Commissioners reportedly raised concerns about greater centralisation of electoral-roll software and access at ECI headquarters.

    Role of field officers: Electoral Registration Officers are statutory officers responsible for constituency-level electoral rolls. ECI guidance directs Form 6 applications to the concerned ERO.

    Collegial decision-making: Section 18 of the 2023 law says Commission business should, as far as possible, be unanimous. Differences are decided by majority.

    ECI’s response: The Commission says individual observations and operational queries should not be confused with final institutional decisions.

    Political response: Opposition parties have cited the reported objections while seeking the CEC’s removal and further scrutiny of the Commission’s functioning.

  3. Key concepts3 / 4
    1. Election Commission under Article 324
    • Article 324 gives the Election Commission superintendence, direction and control over electoral rolls and elections. The Commission consists of the CEC and such other Election Commissioners as the President may fix.
    • The CEC acts as Chairman when other Election Commissioners are appointed.

    News connection: The controversy concerns how authority should operate inside this multi-member constitutional body.

    1. Collective decision-making in the ECI
    • Section 18 of the 2023 Election Commissioners Act governs how Commission business is decided. The Commission may allocate work and regulate procedure through a unanimous decision.
    • Its business should be decided unanimously where possible; if members disagree, the majority view prevails.

    News connection: The reported objections raise a factual question about how administrative steps related to final Commission decisions.

    1. Form 6 and electoral-roll administration
    • Form 6 is used by eligible citizens seeking first-time inclusion in an electoral roll and is prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960.
    • EROs process applications. The reported internal dispute concerns whether an SIR-related declaration could be added without amending the relevant rules.
    1. Removal of the Chief Election Commissioner
    • Article 324(5) protects the CEC from ordinary executive removal. The CEC can be removed only in the same manner and on the same grounds as a Supreme Court judge.
    • Other Election Commissioners have a different protection: they cannot be removed except on the CEC’s recommendation. A political demand for resignation does not itself remove the office-holder.

    News connection: The Constitution sets a high legal threshold for removing a CEC.

  4. Way forward4 / 4

    Record decisions clearly: Major electoral-roll decisions should leave a clear institutional record showing how the Commission reached them.

    Protect statutory roles: Digital systems should preserve the powers assigned by law to EROs and other election authorities.

    Follow prescribed procedures: Changes to statutory forms should use the legal process required under the relevant election rules.

    Improve transparency: Clear institutional explanations can help distinguish draft-stage discussions from final decisions.

Sources

Syllabus

PaperSubjectSub-topic
GS2PolityElection Commission of India, constitutional bodies, electoral reforms and free and fair elections.
GS2GovernanceInstitutional accountability, transparency and electoral-roll administration.

Topics

Current AffairsBasic Concepts of ConstitutionConstitutional BodiesGovernanceHigher Judiciary (SC and HC)

Practice questions

  1. With reference to the Election Commission of India, consider the following statements: 1. Article 324 vests control over the preparation of electoral rolls in the Election Commission. 2. The Chief Election Commissioner acts as Chairman of a multi-member Election Commission. 3. The Chief Election Commissioner can unilaterally override the other Election Commissioners. Which of the statements given above are correct?

    1. 1 only
    2. 1 and 2 only
    3. 2 and 3 only
    4. 1, 2 and 3
    Show answer

    Answer: B. Statements 1 and 2 follow Article 324. Section 18 of the 2023 Act provides for majority decision-making when Commissioners disagree.

    Difficulty: medium · statement

  2. Consider the following statements regarding the transaction of business of the Election Commission: 1. Its business should, as far as possible, be transacted unanimously. 2. A difference of opinion is decided according to the majority view. 3. Allocation of business among the Commissioners can be determined by the CEC acting alone. Which of the statements given above are correct?

    1. 1 only
    2. 1 and 2 only
    3. 2 and 3 only
    4. 1, 2 and 3
    Show answer

    Answer: B. Section 18 requires unanimity for regulating procedure and allocation of business. Where members differ on a matter, the majority decides.

    Difficulty: medium · statement

  3. With reference to the Chief Election Commissioner, consider the following statements: 1. The Constitution provides special protection against removal from office. 2. The CEC can be removed in the same manner and on the same grounds as a Supreme Court judge. 3. Other Election Commissioners enjoy exactly the same constitutional removal procedure as the CEC. Which of the statements given above are correct?

    1. 1 and 2 only
    2. 2 only
    3. 1 and 3 only
    4. 1, 2 and 3
    Show answer

    Answer: A. Article 324(5) gives the CEC stronger removal protection. Other Election Commissioners may be removed only on the CEC’s recommendation.

    Difficulty: medium · statement

Mains practice

Answer-writing practice on this article. Attempt it first, then open the hints.

  1. GS2 · 150 words

    Examine how collective decision-making strengthens the institutional independence of the Election Commission of India.

    Show hints
    1. Constitutional position under Article 324.
    2. Multi-member character of the Commission.
    3. Unanimity and majority rule under Section 18.
    4. Prevention of excessive concentration of authority.
    5. Importance of transparent institutional records.
  2. GS2 · 250 words

    Discuss the challenges created by increasing digitisation of electoral-roll administration in India.

    Show hints
    1. Faster and more integrated voter services.
    2. Role of statutory Electoral Registration Officers.
    3. Database access and accountability.
    4. Audit trails and cyber security.
    5. Combine technology with legally defined institutional responsibility.